<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Marie Haynes - Latest Comments</title><link>http://hiswebmarketing.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://hiswebmarketing.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:51:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t fall for small business SEO scams</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/dont-fall-for-small-business-seo-scams/#comment-2109197021</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Sonya. Sending from a gmail address is always a red flag for me. I'm glad that my post helped!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marie Haynes</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:51:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t fall for small business SEO scams</title><link>http://www.hiswebmarketing.com/dont-fall-for-small-business-seo-scams/#comment-2106800968</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Sonya. Sending from a gmail address is always a red flag for me. I'm glad that my post helped!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marie Haynes</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:51:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t fall for small business SEO scams</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/dont-fall-for-small-business-seo-scams/#comment-2109196847</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for posting this as the last one I got seemed semi-genuine but the name is different for the same Skype Name. I have noticed that a lot are from Gmail accounts and always wonder why they don't write from their domain which to me seems dodgy. It's so easy for people to be caught out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sonya</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2015 13:27:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Don&amp;#8217;t fall for small business SEO scams</title><link>http://www.hiswebmarketing.com/dont-fall-for-small-business-seo-scams/#comment-2103374243</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for posting this as the last one I got seemed semi-genuine but the name is different for the same Skype Name. I have noticed that a lot are from Gmail accounts and always wonder why they don't write from their domain which to me seems dodgy. It's so easy for people to be caught out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sonya</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:27:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Here is what Google says about footer links and penalties.</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/footer-links-and-penalties/#comment-2109196226</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good post ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Annonces services à domicile</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:46:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My response to Link Research Tool&amp;#039s report on cashlady.co.uk</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/my-response-to-link-research-tools-report-on-cashlady/#comment-2109196109</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. I used a link removal service but found that it recommended removing links I already knew about and was removing already or links I wouldn't remove because they were natural links. Or no follow links.  It wasn't useful at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ducktoes</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 04:23:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My response to Link Research Tool&amp;#8217;s report on cashlady.co.uk</title><link>http://www.hiswebmarketing.com/my-response-to-link-research-tools-report-on-cashlady/#comment-2071246282</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. I used a link removal service but found that it recommended removing links I already knew about and was removing already or links I wouldn't remove because they were natural links. Or no follow links.  It wasn't useful at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ducktoes</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:23:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apparently you can tell if a link has been disavowed. So I did some experiments...</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/tell-link-disavowed/#comment-2109196409</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good, and interesting info re: disavowed links - thanks :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Kuiper - SEO Analyst</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 16:10:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apparently you can tell if a link has been disavowed. So I did some experiments&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.hiswebmarketing.com/tell-link-disavowed/#comment-2068212812</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good, and interesting info re: disavowed links - thanks :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Kuiper - SEO Analyst</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 12:10:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My review of Moz&amp;#8217;s spam tool.  I ran some tests and here is what I found&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/moz-spam-tool/#comment-2109196811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very nice post even i would say that whole blog is awesome. you have shared valuable things on your website i have crawled your all blog post and found a lot thing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.capitalstars.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.capitalstars.com/"&gt;Commodity tips &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Capital Stars</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:53:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Webmaster Central Hangout - March 24, 2014</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/google-webmaster-central-hangout-march-24-2014/#comment-2109196180</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For those who are interested, more summaries of John Muller's google webmaster central hangouts are available here: &lt;a href="https://ligatures.net/content/expertise/seo-guidelines-and-checklists.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://ligatures.net/content/expertise/seo-guidelines-and-checklists.html"&gt;https://ligatures.net/conte...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jérôme Verstrynge</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:12:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Manual Spam Actions Viewer not showing that your penalty is lifted?</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/manual-spam-actions-viewer-not-showing-your-penalty-is-lifted/#comment-2109196099</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This sounds like a case where your penalty expired.  I've seen it happen quite a few times now.  Here is more information:  &lt;a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/sew/how-to/2345875/did-your-manual-penalty-disappear-it-probably-expired" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://searchenginewatch.com/sew/how-to/2345875/did-your-manual-penalty-disappear-it-probably-expired"&gt;http://searchenginewatch.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marie Haynes</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:38:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Manual Spam Actions Viewer not showing that your penalty is lifted?</title><link>http://www.hiswebmarketing.com/manual-spam-actions-viewer-not-showing-your-penalty-is-lifted/#comment-1957298774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This sounds like a case where your penalty expired.  I've seen it happen quite a few times now.  Here is more information:  &lt;a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/sew/how-to/2345875/did-your-manual-penalty-disappear-it-probably-expired" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://searchenginewatch.com/sew/how-to/2345875/did-your-manual-penalty-disappear-it-probably-expired"&gt;http://searchenginewatch.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marie Haynes</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:38:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Manual Spam Actions Viewer not showing that your penalty is lifted?</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/manual-spam-actions-viewer-not-showing-your-penalty-is-lifted/#comment-2109196091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Marie,&lt;br&gt;1 Question before some days I updated the disavow as i got a message of partial matches for one of my client. I received the message of successfully uploading the disavow, and after a week now when i am checking Manual spam I found prompt  "No manual webspam action found", however didn't received any message of  getting revoked from google.&lt;br&gt;What i should consider?&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zeshan Ahmer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 06:47:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Manual Spam Actions Viewer not showing that your penalty is lifted?</title><link>http://www.hiswebmarketing.com/manual-spam-actions-viewer-not-showing-your-penalty-is-lifted/#comment-1956787490</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Marie,&lt;br&gt;1 Question before some days I updated the disavow as i got a message of partial matches for one of my client. I received the message of successfully uploading the disavow, and after a week now when i am checking Manual spam I found prompt  "No manual webspam action found", however didn't received any message of  getting revoked from google.&lt;br&gt;What i should consider?&lt;br&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zeshan Ahmer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 02:47:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your traffic drop may not be because of a penalty! Complete list of reasons for your traffic to drop.</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/reasons-for-traffic-to-drop-other-than-penalty/#comment-2109196377</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Karthik.  I'd have to spend time digging in to say for sure, but the first place I would look would be to see if you had issues with Panda.  Where are you getting your recipes from?  Are you uploading 15 unique and helpful recipes each month?  Or are these aggregated from another source.  If you're using material that people can find elsewhere, then this is a very common Panda factor.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marie Haynes</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 14:15:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your traffic drop may not be because of a penalty! Complete list of reasons for your traffic to drop.</title><link>http://www.hiswebmarketing.com/reasons-for-traffic-to-drop-other-than-penalty/#comment-1948991138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Karthik.  I'd have to spend time digging in to say for sure, but the first place I would look would be to see if you had issues with Panda.  Where are you getting your recipes from?  Are you uploading 15 unique and helpful recipes each month?  Or are these aggregated from another source.  If you're using material that people can find elsewhere, then this is a very common Panda factor.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marie Haynes</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 10:15:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your traffic drop may not be because of a penalty! Complete list of reasons for your traffic to drop.</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/reasons-for-traffic-to-drop-other-than-penalty/#comment-2109196373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Thank you for your great information. My site is &lt;a href="http://www.thamilvirundhu.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.thamilvirundhu.com"&gt;www.thamilvirundhu.com&lt;/a&gt; and started before 11 months. I have uploaded nearly 300 recipes, but got only 35000 visits / month. I have been uploading 15 recipes per month. There is neither decrease nor increase in traffic for the past 8 months. It is not ranked by &lt;a href="http://www.trafficestimate.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.trafficestimate.com/"&gt;http://www.trafficestimate....&lt;/a&gt; because of not enough data. ( but the sites which have even 20000 visits/month are ranked in it. My site's visit is 35000). I have checked all the above possible causes you mentioned here. What would be the reason ? Thank you in advance.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karthik</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 13:02:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your traffic drop may not be because of a penalty! Complete list of reasons for your traffic to drop.</title><link>http://www.hiswebmarketing.com/reasons-for-traffic-to-drop-other-than-penalty/#comment-1944035625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  Thank you for your great information. My site is &lt;a href="http://www.thamilvirundhu.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.thamilvirundhu.com"&gt;www.thamilvirundhu.com&lt;/a&gt; and started before 11 months. I have uploaded nearly 300 recipes, but got only 35000 visits / month. I have been uploading 15 recipes per month. There is neither decrease nor increase in traffic for the past 8 months. It is not ranked by &lt;a href="http://www.trafficestimate.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.trafficestimate.com/"&gt;http://www.trafficestimate....&lt;/a&gt; because of not enough data. ( but the sites which have even 20000 visits/month are ranked in it. My site's visit is 35000). I have checked all the above possible causes you mentioned here. What would be the reason ? Thank you in advance.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karthik</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 09:02:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My review of Moz&amp;#8217;s spam tool.  I ran some tests and here is what I found&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/moz-spam-tool/#comment-2109196813</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I ran it on several sites that I happen to know had a manual spam penalty, and one of them scored more than a 2/17.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jacques Bouchard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:11:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My review of Moz&amp;#8217;s spam tool.  I ran some tests and here is what I found&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.hiswebmarketing.com/moz-spam-tool/#comment-1940174167</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I ran it on several sites that I happen to know had a manual spam penalty, and one of them scored more than a 2/17.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jacques Bouchard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:11:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My review of Moz&amp;#8217;s spam tool.  I ran some tests and here is what I found&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/moz-spam-tool/#comment-2109196822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks so much Cyrus.  I know that Moz has worked hard on this tool and I certainly don't want to belittle that work.  I can see that I actually could use the tool in my auditing process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Again, my concern is that it is made very obvious that the tool is not to be used in the place of a full manual link audit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But then again, considering that that's my main line of business, perhaps I am biased.  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marie Haynes</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 00:24:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My review of Moz&amp;#8217;s spam tool.  I ran some tests and here is what I found&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/moz-spam-tool/#comment-2109196818</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Marie,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you for writing it as Moz is always open to feedback - even "hard" feedback. We're a big, diverse family with different points of views, and the Moz community has definitely benefited from your expertise and contributions We learn from each other, and I consider you a valuable part of the community. Discussion is always welcome, and even necessary. Looking forward to further conversations and collaborations with you!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Disclaimer: While I work for Moz, I can't speak for them on this particular &lt;br&gt;subject as others who worked on this particular feature are better &lt;br&gt;suited. That said, I can tell you that we take feedback like this very seriously.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cyrus Shepard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My review of Moz&amp;#8217;s spam tool.  I ran some tests and here is what I found&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.hiswebmarketing.com/moz-spam-tool/#comment-1939019639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks so much Cyrus.  I know that Moz has worked hard on this tool and I certainly don't want to belittle that work.  I can see that I actually could use the tool in my auditing process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Again, my concern is that it is made very obvious that the tool is not to be used in the place of a full manual link audit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But then again, considering that that's my main line of business, perhaps I am biased.  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marie Haynes</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:24:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My review of Moz&amp;#8217;s spam tool.  I ran some tests and here is what I found&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.mariehaynes.com/moz-spam-tool/#comment-2109196823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Paul.  I am thinking that if Moz made it more clear that the tool was not made to be used to replace manual reviews, it would be so much better.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have not tested whether the links that are missing are not in the Moz index, but I am guessing that that's what is indeed happening.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marie Haynes</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:59:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>